RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF WIRELESS DATA EXCHANGE TECHNOLOGIES WHEN CREATING INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR AGRO-MONITORING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/IT/2024-3-11Keywords:
wireless networks, reliability, neural networks, QoS, data transmission, network performanceAbstract
Relevance. The reliability of wireless networks is a critical aspect in modern infocommunication systems, especially given their widespread use in a variety of industries, including agriculture, healthcare, transportation, and industry. These networks must provide continuous and reliable communication, which is becoming increasingly important in the context of the growing number of connected devices and increasing requirements for quality of service (QoS). Reliability here includes the ability of a network to continue to function properly during and after failures, as well as ensuring secure data transmission. The main aim is to conduct a comparative analysis of several architectures of neural networks in order to determine the most suitable for modeling the reliability of wireless networks. In the second part of the study, several wireless communication standards will be simulated using the selected algorithm, which will allow for a deeper analysis and draw conclusions about reliability. The research object is the modern wireless communication standards and their effectiveness under various application conditions. The research subject is methods and models of comparison of the performance and characteristics of 5G, Wi-Fi, LTE, and Zigbee for different types of networks and applications. Conclusions. The results emphasize that 5G is the most promising standard for applications requiring high data transfer speeds and low latency. Wi-Fi remains a popular choice for local networks, but its performance decreases over long distances and in environments with significant interference. LTE offers a good balance between coverage area and performance, while Zigbee is the least performant but effective for low-speed and energy-efficient IoT applications. Overall, the research results confirm that the choice of wireless communication standard depends on specific network requirements, including bandwidth needs, coverage area, latency, and energy efficiency.
References
Sharma P., Khatri S. P., Kumar P. An intelligent healthcare system using IoT in wireless sensor network. Sensors. 2023. Vol. 23 (11). P. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23115055.
Pinconschi E., Gopinath D., Abreu R., Păsăreanu C. S. Evaluating Deep Neural Networks in Deployment: A Comparative Study (Replicability Study). arXiv preprint arXiv: arXiv:2407.08730v2. 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2407.08730
Muñoz-Zavala A. E., Macías-Díaz J. E., Alba-Cuéllar D., Guerrero-Díaz-de-León J. A. A Literature Review on Some Trends in Artificial Neural Networks for Modeling and Simulation with Time Series. Algorithms. 2024. Vol. 17 (2). P. 1–45. https://doi.org/10.3390/a17020076.
Zhu H., Zhang H., Lu W., Li X. Foreformer: An enhanced transformer-based framework for multivariate time series forecasting. Neural Comp. and App. 2023. Vol. 35. P. 14467–14480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-08091-1.
Wang Y.-C., Houng Y.-C., Chen H.-X., Tseng S.-M. Network Anomaly Intrusion Detection Based on Deep Learning Approach. Sensors. 2023. Vol. 23 (4), P. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23042171.
Rafique S. H., Abdallah A., Musa N. S., Murugan T. Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Internet of Things Network Anomaly Detection–Current Research Trends. Sensors. 2024. Vol. 24 (6). P. 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24061968
Naidu G. A., Kumar J. Wireless Protocols: Wi-Fi SON, Bluetooth, ZigBee, Z-Wave, and Wi-Fi. In R. K. Singh & G. Kumar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on IT & Multimedia. 2019. P. 229–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3765-9_24.
Alsabah M., Naser M. A., Mahmmod B. M., Abdulhussain S. H., et al. 6G Wireless Communications Networks: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Access. 2021. Vol. 99. P. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3124812.
Shilpa B., Radha R., Movva P. Comparative Analysis of Wireless Communication Technologies for IoT Applications. Artificial Intelligence and Technologies. 2022. P. 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-6448-9_39.
Shuaib K., Boulmalf M., Sallabi F., Lakas A. Co-existence of ZigBee and Wi-Fi: An Experimental Study. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing. 2006. P. 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/WTS.2006.334532.
Raza U., Kulkarni P., Sooriyabandara M. Low Power Wide Area Networks: An Overview. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. 2017. Vol. 19, No. 2. P. 855–873. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2652320.
Al-Fuqaha A., Guizani M., Mohammadi M., Aledhari M., Ayyash M. Internet of Things: A Survey on Enabling Technologies, Protocols, and Applications. IEEE Commun. Surveys & Tutorials. 2015. Vol. 17, No. 4. P. 2347–2376. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2015.2444095.
