CURRENT TRENDS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION IN THE SECURITY FIELD: NATIONALAND GLOBALASPECTS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33287/102063

Keywords:

public administration, national security, military security, securitization of political life, national identity

Abstract

Current trends in public administration are considered in the context of national security imperatives, in particular regarding prevention and elimination of military conflicts, achievement of international understanding and formation of a global security environment. In recent decades, military conflicts of varying intensity and scale, both in Europe and beyond the continent, have remained a potential threat to Ukraine and all European countries. The research methodology is based on a systematic approach, which, in particular, summarizes modern interpretations of public administration and identifies problematic aspects of reforming modern governance structures amid globalization, informatization and democratization of the society and government. The position on the effectiveness and political perspective of democratic reforms is substantiated. Similar processes are observed in public administration in the security field within the democratic trend aimed at developing a dialogue between society and government through the active involvement of a wide range of non-state actors. On the basis of the dialectical method the trends of public administration development in the field of military security are researched and their ambivalence is argued. The global context of the new consolidated view on the protection of the common future of humanity is noted. The axiological method has provided an opportunity to characterize the processes of securitization of socio-political life and to determine the prospects for reducing its conflictogenity. It is consistently held that the most effective and efficient is the combination of three levels of identity in integrated European societies: maintaining strong positions of the customary national level of self-identification, transnational level of common European values and ethnic level of identity - preservation of historical memory.

References

Зелінський А. Політика сек'юритизації як модель ідеології національної безпеки. Магістеріум. Політичні студіі". 2016. Вип. 64. С. 8 – 14.

Макарьчев А. Безопасность и возвращение политического: критические дебать в Европе. Индекс безопасности. 2008. № 4(87), т. 14. С. 25 –40.

Політика суспільних реформ: стратегія, механізми, ресурси / за ред. О. О. Рафальського, О. М. Майбороди. Київ: Ін-т політ. і етнонац. дослідж. ім. І. Ф. Кураса. 2018. 472 с.

Хельберг У. Сек'юритизація як політичний феномен Магістеріум. Політичні студіі". 2011. Вип. 46. С. 31 – 40.

Зйвазов Д. Секьюритизация и региональная активность держав на примере политики России в украинском кризисе. Международнье процессь. 2017. Т. 15, № 4. С. 156 – 173. doi: 10.17994/IT.2017.15.4.51.9.

Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In Lenin and philosophy and other essays. London: New Left Books.

Barnes, Richard A. (2000). Democratic Governance and International Law, edited by Gregory H. Fox and Brad R. Roth. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 8(1), 281 – 299. Retrieved from https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijgls/vol8/iss1/15.

Bassam, T. (1998). Europa ohne Identitat? Die Krise der multikulturellen Gesellschaft. Munchen: C. Bertelsmann.

Castells, M. (2009). The Power of Identity. Hoboken, N I: Wiley-Blackwell.

Grote, J. R. Social Cohesion and the State: Improving governability, legitimacy, accountability. Retrieved August 23, 2018 from https://www.g20-insights.org/policy_briefs/ improving-governability-legitimacy-accountability.

Hooghe L., & Marks, G. (2002). Types of multi-level governance. Les Cahiers europeens de Sciences Po, 03, 6 – 7 Retrieved from https://www.sciencespo.fr/centre-etudes-europeennes/ sites/sciencespo.fr.centre-etudes-europeennes/files/n3_2002_final.pdf.

Kalyayev, А., Efimov, G., Motornyy, V., Dzianyy, R., & Akimova, L. (2019). Global Security Governance: Conceptual Approaches and Practical Imperatives. Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference. Spain: Granada, (pp. 4484 – 4495).

Kalyayev, A. Kozlowski, R., Wozniak-Krakowian, A., Podolchak, N., & Dziurakh, Y. (2019, November). Collective identity and multiculturalism in modern society and governance: European context. Proceedings of the 34th International Business Information Management Association Conference. Spain: Madrid, (pp. 9762 – 9771).

Laclau, E., & Mouffe, Ch. (1985). Hegemony and socialist strategy: towards a radical democratic politics. London: Verso.

Novak-Kalyayeva, L., Kuczabski, A., Yasnyska, N., Andreyeva S., & Shapovalova, I. (2018, November). Changing the paradigm of public governance in the context of the challenges of sustainable development. Proceedings of the 32th International Business Information Management Association Conference. Spain: Seville, (pp. 2023 – 2031).

Smith, A. (1994). National Identity. London: Penguin books.

Taliaferro, J. W. (2000). Security Seeking under Anarchy Defensive Realism Revisited. International Security, 25(3), 128 – 161.

Published

2023-04-18

Issue

Section

THEORY AND HISTORY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION