BETTER REGULATION IN THE EU AND ITS MEMBER STATES: EXPERIENCE FOR UKRAINE

Authors

  • Oleksandr RUDIK

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33287/101903

Keywords:

europeization, state regulation, democratic governance, better regulation, regulatory instruments, European experience.

Abstract

The article examines the experience of better regulation in the EU and its member states. The European Union and the 28 EU member states show a strong political commitment towards regulatory reform. In the European Union, regulatory policy has progressed under the better regulation agenda and played a crucial role in shaping the current regulatory processes. At the same time, all EU member states have adopted an explicit policy to promote the quality of regulations. To this end, the author analyses the key findings of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 2019 report «Better Regulation Practices across the European Union». In the report the OECD has analysed the application of all 28 EU member states’ regulatory management tools to EU-made laws and regulations. The article also gives examples of the best regulatory practices of the EU member states such as Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Malta, the Netherlands, Slovakia, Sweden, the United Kingdom. The article concludes that the experience of the EU and its member states in developing and implementing a better regulation policy, in particular the better regulation agenda, is beneficial for Ukraine. In this regard, the article highlights the following legislative and institutional components of this experience: stakeholder engagement in the process of policymaking and regulatory policy implementation by automatically publishing of draft regulatory acts and accompanying impact assessments on the specially designed interactive government portal; highlighting the preliminary and final stages of regulatory impact assessment of all regulations, except for deregulatory and low-cost measures, thereby taking into account stakeholder comments; regular and systematic conduct of ex ante and ex-post evaluation of laws and regulations on the basis of a specially developed sound evidence-based methodology; conducting of regulatory impact assessment and stakeholder engagement during the process of EU directives transposition into member states’ national legislation; introduction of systematic regulatory oversight and quality control of regulatory management tools, which should cover not only regulatory impact assessment practice but also stakeholder engagement.

References

Alemanno, A. (2015, September). How Much Better is Better Regulation?: Assessing the Impact of the Better Regulation Package on the European Union – A Research Agenda. European Journal of Risk Regulation. Vol. 6, (3), 344–356.

Austria. Indicators of regulatory policy and governance: Europe 2019. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/indicators-of-regulatory-policy-and-governance- 2019-austria.pdf.

Belgium. Indicators of regulatory policy and governance: Europe 2019. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/indicators-of-regulatory-policy-and-governance- 2019-belgium.pdf.

Better Regulation Practices across the European Union (2019). Paris : OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/better-regulation-practices-across-the- european-union-9789264311732-en.htm.

Better Regulation Practices across the European Union: Highlights. (2019). Paris: OECD Publishing, Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/EU-Highlights-Brochure- 2019.pdf.

Booth, C. (2018). Better Regulation Initiatives. In J. Foreman (Ed.), Developments in Environmental Regulation. Palgrave Studies in Environmental Policy and Regulation (pp. 91–136). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319- 61937-8_3.

Croatia. Indicators of regulatory policy and governance: Europe 2019. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/indicators-of-regulatory-policy-and-governance- 2019-croatia.pdf.

Dawson, M. (2016). Better regulation and the future of EU regulatory law and politics. Common Market Law Review, 53 (5), 1209–1235. Retrieved from http://kluwerlawonline.com/ abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2016114.

Denmark. Indicators of regulatory policy and governance: Europe 2019. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/indicators-of-regulatory-policy-and-governance- 2019-denmark.pdf.

Directorate for Impact Assessment and European Added Value. Retrieved from https:// www.europarl.europa.eu/at-your-service/en/stay-informed/research-and-analysis.

Eliantonio, M., & Spendzharova, A. (2017). The European Union’s New «Better Regulation» Agenda: Between Procedures and Politics. Introduction to the Special Issue. European Journal of Law Reform, 1–2 (19), 3–15. doi: 10.5553/EJLR/138723702017019102001.

European Union. Indicators of regulatory policy and governance: Europe 2019. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/indicators-of-regulatory-policy-and- governance-2019-eu.pdf.

Germany. Indicators of regulatory policy and governance: Europe 2019. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/indicators-of-regulatory-policy-and-governance- 2019-germany.pdf.

Have your say. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your- say_en.

Ireland. Indicators of regulatory policy and governance: Europe 2019. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/indicators-of-regulatory-policy-and-governance- 2019-ireland.pdf.

Italy. Indicators of regulatory policy and governance: Europe 2019. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/indicators-of-regulatory-policy-and-governance- 2019-italy.pdf.

Malta. Indicators of regulatory policy and governance: Europe 2019. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/indicators-of-regulatory-policy-and-governance- 2019-malta.pdf.

Netherlands. Indicators of regulatory policy and governance: Europe 2019. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/indicators-of-regulatory-policy-and-governance- 2019-netherlands.pdf.

Radaelli, C., & Francesco, F. de. (2007). Regulatory Quality in Europe: Concepts, Measures and Policy Processes. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Regulatory Scrutiny Board (RSB). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law- making-process/regulatory-scrutiny-board_en.

Schultz, R., Arndt-Bascle, C., Davidson, P., & Gerloff, B. Better indicators for better regulation: the OECD iREG experience. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory- policy/Better-indicators-for-better-regulation.pdf.

Slovakia. Indicators of regulatory policy and governance: Europe 2019. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/indicators-of-regulatory-policy-and-governance- 2019-slovak-republic.pdf.

United Kingdom. Indicators of regulatory policy and governance: Europe 2019. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/indicators-of-regulatory-policy-and- governance-2019-uk.pdf.

Verbruggen, P. (2017). Private Regulation in EU Better Regulation Past Performance and Future Promises. European Journal of Law Reform, 9(1–2), 121–140. doi: 10.5553/EJLR/ 138723702017019102007.

Willems, P. (2016). Better Regulation in the EU – A Process and Debate at the Core of Regional Integration. In J. de Zwaan, M. Lak, A. Makinwa, P. Willems (Eds.), Governance and Security Issues of the European Union (рр. 53–72). The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-144-9_4.

Published

2023-04-26

Issue

Section

THEORY AND HISTORY OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION