CONCEPTS AND TYPES PROCEDURAL ACTIONS OF COURT IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32782/LST/2022-1-20

Keywords:

procedural actions, judicial action, investigator, investigation, research.

Abstract

The purpose of the research, the results of which are presented in this article, was to define the concept of court procedural actions through the creation of a classification model of the corresponding system. The research methodology is based on the use of dialectical and systemic methods. Methods of formal logic (analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, abstraction, etc.) were used in the development of the regulatory framework and scientific sources. Hermeneutic and formal legal methods were used to clarify the internal content of certain norms of criminal procedural legislation. The terminological analysis method was used to define the concept of court procedural actions, and the classification method was used to systematize them. The goal was determined taking into account the fact that the unambiguous definition of this, like any other scientific term, is an important theoretical task, the solution of which gives the researcher an understanding of exactly what object he is dealing with in this or that case. Defining the meaning of the term "judicial action" first of all made it possible to answer the question of which of the actions provided for by law should be considered judicial. In accordance with this, the author substantiated the legality and proposed the criteria for the admissibility of conducting a personal examination in court and the court's demand from state authorities, local self-government bodies, enterprises, institutions and organizations, officials and individuals of things, documents, information necessary to verify the authenticity and admissibility of existing evidence. As a result of the conducted research, the author's definition of "Procedural actions of the court in criminal proceedings" was formulated and a classification model of this system was proposed, which includes: actual judicial actions, in particular of an investigative nature and other actions of a cognitive orientation, judicial actions; organizational (preparatory and supporting) actions of the court; other procedural actions of the court, related to the movement of the case and the procedure of the trial.

References

Якимович Ю.К. Особенности уголовно-процессуальной деятельности. Закон и право. 2015. № 7. С. 106-110.

Бандурка А.М., Бочарова С.П., Землянская Е.В. Юридическая психология: Учебник. Харьков: Изд-во Нац. ун-та внутр. дел, 2002. 596 с. 3. Россинский С.Б. Судебные действия как средства познания обстоятельств уголовного дела. Российский судья. 2014. № 12. С. 28-32. 4. Шепітько І.І. Судовий розгляд (судове слідство) в системі судового провадження у першій інстанції : дис. … канд. юрид. наук : 12.00.09. Харків, 2018. 269 с.

Воробьев Г.А. Тактика и психологические особенности судебных действий : учеб. пособие. Краснодар : Краснодарский ун-т, 1986. 200 с.

Александрова С.А. Понятие и система судебных действий в уголовном судопроизводстве Российской Федерации. Вестник Воронежского государственного университета. Серия: Право. 2009. № 2. С. 407-415.

Когутич І. І. Тактика у криміналістиці та окремі її предметно-методологічні суперечності [Частина ІІ. Продовження]. Вісник Чернівецького факультету Національного університету «Одеська юридична академія». Випуск № 2. 2018. С. 192-205.

Published

2023-04-03

Issue

Section

CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, CRIMINALISTICS