INFORMATION SECURITY IN THE CONDITIONS OF MARTIAL LAW IN THE ASPECT OF ENSURING THE INFORMATION RIGHTS OF CITIZENS

Abstract

The scientific article examines the problems of implementation of procedures for the realization and protection of property rights of a person in the conditions of martial law. Attention is focused on the need to achieve a balance between the public interest of society, which consists in promoting the protection of the country and its defense, and private interest, which is understood as the right of ownership and other property rights of a person to use the property that belongs to him. The purpose of the scientific article is to characterize the features of the protection of property rights and interests of an individual during the alienation of a vehicle under the conditions of martial law. It was determined that after the abolition of the legal regime of martial law, persons whose property was expropriated have the right to return such property or to reimbursement of the value of such property in accordance with the procedure established by law. It is emphasized that the payment of full compensation is carried out by the bodies that made a decision on the forced alienation of property, in the order of priority of issuing conclusions at the expense and within the limits of the funds provided in the state budget for the payment of the next full compensation for property forcibly alienated under the legal regime of war or emergency state It is emphasized that if after the abolition of the legal regime of martial law or a state of emergency, the property that was forcibly alienated is preserved, and the former owner or a person authorized by him insists on the return of the property, such return is carried out in court. It was concluded that the basis for the return of property is a court decision that has entered into force. It is emphasized that in order to fully protect the property rights of the owners of vehicles in which the respective vehicles have been expropriated, it is recommended to make an assessment of the value of the car in advance and correctly draw up an act of forced seizure/ expropriation of property, while a copy of the act and assessment of the vehicle must be assigned to the appropriate and the necessary evidentiary basis when resolving a dispute in court. It was emphasized that the persons guilty of violating the legislation on the compensation of the value of forcibly alienated property and on the return of forcibly alienated property that has been preserved are liable in accordance with the current legislation of Ukraine.